".having one for each major area of the build but anything more would be detrimental to the advantages of using VS."
Why? From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ged Murphy Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 6:51 PM To: ReactOS List Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Notice Of Intent - Visual Studio Build of ReactOS Having a solution for each project is like having a separate build system for each project. You could probably break it down to between 5-10 solutions, having one for each major area of the build but anything more would be detrimental to the advantages of using VS. From: Timo Kreuzer <[email protected]> Reply-To: ReactOS List <[email protected]> Date: Friday, 11 January 2013 21:16 To: ReactOS List <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Notice Of Intent - Visual Studio Build of ReactOS Am 11.01.2013 06:48, schrieb BinSys: I suggest a sln file in each directory. Only a sln file is too big, very slow to load. I agree, but before changing this, we should measure a possible performance impact on the configure operation. (We are talking about generating a few hundred solution files) I don't know if it has any impact at all (especially for non-VS build), but you never know... _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev _____ No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2013.0.2890 / Virus Database: 2637/6025 - Release Date: 01/11/13
_______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
