Hiding test results make you feel happy, well I'm happy for you.

But,,,,, I can not be held to the false test result from this point
on....... I will close bug reports based on false results that anyone
points to me....... I do not get paid for chasing ghost bugs, wow I do
not get paid at all!!!

That's my two cents......



On 11/14/13, Aleksey Bragin <alek...@reactos.org> wrote:
> I agree to every Timo's line here, so my 50 cents add up to make a buck
> (or a euro) there.
>
>
> Regards,
> Aleksey
>
> On 14.11.2013 23:10, Timo Kreuzer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I disagree here. The major purpose of these tests is to let us detect
>> regressions. But when there is all red anyway, noone notices anything.
>> It's hard to spot what went wrong, when there is 2275 failures instead
>> of 2272. Also the results are not lost, they are just moved out of the
>> way of failing tests. You can still see all the todos.
>> Being able to see where ros fails, but wine succeeds is a valuable
>> feature, but it's pretty pointless, when it comes at the cost of being
>> able to quickly and properly detect regressions. Maybe we can have
>> both and provide a way to disable this, if someone wants to compare
>> against wine. Patchbot is our friend.
>>
>> My wish would be that we only had all green in testbot and whenever
>> something gets red, Alekseys red telephone starts ringing and he
>> mobilizes the red army... ;-)
>>
>> Just my 50 cents,
>> Timo
>>
>> Am 14.11.2013 19:18, schrieb James Tabor:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> This should be removed, we are not wine and I personally work "hard
>>> on" getting wine todos fixed in ReactOS! This also breaks the DCE test.
>>>
>>>
>>> Background, GvG and then the old guard back in the day thought the
>>> same way as I do about this issue. We should count the todo's as
>>> failures and not bypass these failues. Why? It may point to a
>>> critical bug that could break functionality somewhere else. That was
>>> the reasoning then and I agree with it. Cheating the tests is just
>>> plain cheating......
>>>
>>>
>>> James
>
>

_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

Reply via email to