Hmm, my thought behind disabling this was more that this one test doesn't justify increasing our whole test run time by 10%.
On 2014-11-11 11:12, spetreo...@svn.reactos.org wrote:
Author: spetreolle Date: Tue Nov 11 16:12:14 2014 New Revision: 65378 URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=65378&view=rev Log: [ADVAPI_WINETEST] Make peace^W tests, not war.☮ Wave a hello to sysreg so that it doesn't kill us. ROSTESTS-56 Modified: trunk/rostests/winetests/advapi32/service.c Modified: trunk/rostests/winetests/advapi32/service.c URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos/trunk/rostests/winetests/advapi32/service.c?rev=65378&r1=65377&r2=65378&view=diff ============================================================================== --- trunk/rostests/winetests/advapi32/service.c [iso-8859-1] (original) +++ trunk/rostests/winetests/advapi32/service.c [iso-8859-1] Tue Nov 11 16:12:14 2014 @@ -2166,6 +2166,9 @@ DWORD le1, le2; SERVICE_STATUS status; +#ifdef __REACTOS__ + fprintf(stdout, "ROSTESTS-56: Hello sysreg, I am awake\n"); +#endif ret = StartServiceA(svc_handle, 0, NULL); le1 = GetLastError(); ok(!ret, "%s: StartServiceA() should have failed\n", name); @@ -2260,12 +2263,6 @@ * insanely long timeout: 120s. So skip the rest of the tests. */ win_skip("Skip some service start/stop tests on NT4\n"); - goto cleanup; - } - - if (!winetest_interactive) - { - skip("ROSTESTS-56: Skipping service start timeout tests!\n"); goto cleanup; }
_______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
