Heheh, who could it be... ^^
It was always a event to watch you two arguing. ^^


Am 23.11.2014 21:57 schrieb Alex Ionescu <ion...@videotron.ca>:
>
> I'm just going to chime in here and confirm that Timo does indeed own a 
> master's diploma on surviving pissing contests, taught by the greatest master 
> there ever was.
>
> Best regards,
> Alex Ionescu
>
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Timo Kreuzer <timo.kreu...@web.de> wrote:
>>
>> Am 22.11.2014 11:39, schrieb Love Nystrom:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2014-11-21 04.00, Timo Kreuzer wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Am 20.11.2014 14:18, schrieb Love Nystrom:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Well... Actually not exactly the same.. ;)
>>>>> "if (f != FALSE)" requires an explicit comparison with a second operand,
>>>>
>>>> No, it does not. It requries the compiler to generate code that executes 
>>>> the following statement, when f is not 0.
>>>
>>>
>>> I suspect we look at it from two different viewpoints here..
>>> Yours is "C centric" and mine is "object code centric".
>>> You talk about what the compiler is required to do, 
>>> and I talk about what comes out at the end of compilation.
>>
>> And what comes out at the end of the compilation is what the compiler 
>> creates. And the compiler is following the rules of the C standard and the 
>> rules of logic.
>> You claimed '"if (f != FALSE)" requires an explicit comparison with a second 
>> operand,' and that is factually wrong. No matter whether you are looking at 
>> it from the compiler perspective or from the perspective of an expressionist 
>> painter living in a yellow tree house on the bottom of Lake Tanganyika.
>>
>>>
>>> And.. dear friend.. don't turn this into a pissing contest.
>>
>> Don't even get me started. I battled the grand master and I survived.
>>
>>
>>> Let's check the egos in with the coat check girl at the entrance.
>>> May I ask how old you are?
>>
>> Are we talking about age or maturity?
>>
>> We better end this discussion, it's not leading anywhere. And you don't want 
>> me to turn into the Grinch and steal your Christmas.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Timo
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ros-dev mailing list
>> Ros-dev@reactos.org
>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

Reply via email to