Heheh, who could it be... ^^ It was always a event to watch you two arguing. ^^
Am 23.11.2014 21:57 schrieb Alex Ionescu <ion...@videotron.ca>: > > I'm just going to chime in here and confirm that Timo does indeed own a > master's diploma on surviving pissing contests, taught by the greatest master > there ever was. > > Best regards, > Alex Ionescu > > On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Timo Kreuzer <timo.kreu...@web.de> wrote: >> >> Am 22.11.2014 11:39, schrieb Love Nystrom: >>> >>> >>> On 2014-11-21 04.00, Timo Kreuzer wrote: >>>> >>>> Am 20.11.2014 14:18, schrieb Love Nystrom: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Well... Actually not exactly the same.. ;) >>>>> "if (f != FALSE)" requires an explicit comparison with a second operand, >>>> >>>> No, it does not. It requries the compiler to generate code that executes >>>> the following statement, when f is not 0. >>> >>> >>> I suspect we look at it from two different viewpoints here.. >>> Yours is "C centric" and mine is "object code centric". >>> You talk about what the compiler is required to do, >>> and I talk about what comes out at the end of compilation. >> >> And what comes out at the end of the compilation is what the compiler >> creates. And the compiler is following the rules of the C standard and the >> rules of logic. >> You claimed '"if (f != FALSE)" requires an explicit comparison with a second >> operand,' and that is factually wrong. No matter whether you are looking at >> it from the compiler perspective or from the perspective of an expressionist >> painter living in a yellow tree house on the bottom of Lake Tanganyika. >> >>> >>> And.. dear friend.. don't turn this into a pissing contest. >> >> Don't even get me started. I battled the grand master and I survived. >> >> >>> Let's check the egos in with the coat check girl at the entrance. >>> May I ask how old you are? >> >> Are we talking about age or maturity? >> >> We better end this discussion, it's not leading anywhere. And you don't want >> me to turn into the Grinch and steal your Christmas. >> >> Thanks, >> Timo >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ros-dev mailing list >> Ros-dev@reactos.org >> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev >> > _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
