On 06.03.2015 15:46, Pierre Schweitzer wrote:
On 03/06/2015 01:30 PM, Hermès BÉLUSCA - MAÏTO wrote:
First I would prefer to revert everything I done so far for that (failed)
attempt of tree restructure, because otherwise nobody will be happy. As far as
I can see in a local SVN repo I did here, if I revert to the tree shape
pre-66575 nothing should break (I mean, if you update your local copy that was
at, let’s say, revision 66574 and you update to revision
after-my-would-be-revert, it should be ok, your local changes should survive.
Given these last information, I'm all for a revert.
Me too, even though technically I like some aspects of the restructure,
and appreciate your time spent on the issue, it's definitely not wasted.
Regards,
Aleksey Bragin
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
