Well this is a weird one, the DDK says these callbacks are cdecl (missing NTAPI) and anyone building against the DDK will obviously declare their callbacks to match this convention. However internally, windows uses stdcall for these callbacks.
I can't find much by way of problems people have encountered with this, so why aren't people seeing problems with the way the stack is cleaned up? Anyone have any ideas before I blindly revert this change? Ged. -----Original Message----- From: Ros-diffs [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: 05 May 2015 19:54 To: [email protected] Subject: [ros-diffs] [gedmurphy] 67563: [DDK] Fix the FS filter callback definitions Author: gedmurphy Date: Tue May 5 18:54:28 2015 New Revision: 67563 URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=67563&view=rev Log: [DDK] Fix the FS filter callback definitions Modified: trunk/reactos/include/ddk/ntifs.h Modified: trunk/reactos/include/ddk/ntifs.h URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos/trunk/reactos/include/ddk/ntifs.h?rev=67563&r1=67562&r2=67563&view=diff ============================================================================== --- trunk/reactos/include/ddk/ntifs.h [iso-8859-1] (original) +++ trunk/reactos/include/ddk/ntifs.h [iso-8859-1] Tue May 5 18:54:28 2015 @@ -4890,12 +4890,12 @@ } FS_FILTER_CALLBACK_DATA, *PFS_FILTER_CALLBACK_DATA; typedef NTSTATUS -(NTAPI *PFS_FILTER_CALLBACK) ( +(*PFS_FILTER_CALLBACK) ( _In_ PFS_FILTER_CALLBACK_DATA Data, _Out_ PVOID *CompletionContext); typedef VOID -(NTAPI *PFS_FILTER_COMPLETION_CALLBACK) ( +(*PFS_FILTER_COMPLETION_CALLBACK) ( _In_ PFS_FILTER_CALLBACK_DATA Data, _In_ NTSTATUS OperationStatus, _In_ PVOID CompletionContext); _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
