Hi Timo, Am 17.05.2015 um 10:41 schrieb Timo Kreuzer: > The names for our builders / testers don't seem to be optimal to me.
Yep, you're right. Our list of builders has grown, so the original naming scheme is far from perfect. > Build_GCCLin_Debug > Build_GCCLin_Release > Build_GCCWin Naming one "Debug" and leaving this out for the others doesn't look good to me. Maybe we'll have a Build_GCCWin_Release someday, this would imply renaming Build_GCCWin then. Let's just leave out "_Debug" and have it as an implicit default. > Build_MSVC_x64 > Build_MSVC_x86 Okay, here we have the architecture as well. But once the x64 version gets more popular, we'll probably have an x64 GCC builder as well. Let's simply add the architecture to all builders. > Test_KVM > Test_VBox > Test_VMW > Test_VMW_Hybrid > Test_WHS Yep, this is simple and conveys all information. So my final suggestion for all builders: Build_GCCLin_x86 Build_GCCLin_x86_Release Build_GCCWin_x86 Build_MSVC_x64 Build_MSVC_x86 Test_KVM Test_VBox Test_VMW Test_VMW_Hybrid Test_WHS Any other suggestions? Objections? If not, I'll do the change in the first week of June. That means changing names in both BuildBot and Testman. Cheers, Colin
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
