I wanted to add a proper '?' switch, but I've seen that if I do that, chkdsk in its current implementation runs afterwards a check (I noticed that after the commit that added the '?'). So I temporarily disabled it in this commit for further investigation (aka. modifying the ProcessCommandLine procedure so that it doesn't run the checkdisk if you use '?', *and* such that it doesn't say that '?' is an unrecognized cmdline option).
Hermès. -----Message d'origine----- De : Ros-dev [mailto:ros-dev-boun...@reactos.org] De la part de Thomas Faber Envoyé : jeudi 3 mars 2016 11:27 À : ros-dev@reactos.org Objet : Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [hbelusca] 70869: [AUTOCHK][CHKDSK]: Minor fixes / formatting. Really add chkdsk to build. [FMIFS]: Quickly implement the chkdsk function, the same way as it is done for the formatting function. On 2016-03-03 01:36, hbelu...@svn.reactos.org wrote: > @@ -160,9 +163,9 @@ > > switch (argv[i][1]) > { > - case L'?': > - Usage(argv[0]); > - break; > + // case L'?': > + // Usage(argv[0]); > + // return i; > > case L'F': case L'f': > { What is the purpose of this? Thanks, Thomas _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev