"Continue doing as it does now, keep the NT5.2 target, stabilize the existing components, and develop the remaining components, all within the limitations of NT5, or"
let´s try to get this to a stable stage, then we will think about NT6+ On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Hans-Peter Diettrich <drdiettri...@aol.com> wrote: > Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo schrieb: > >> And, ROS is not complete yet. Isnt it more reliable to try to get it >> stable for NT5, then shitch to NT6? >> >> If we change now, we are leaving things undone.... and we will leave them >> again when switching to NT7, and so..... >> > > +1 > > I'd like to see a modular system, that can be configured for whatever > compatibility - as far as possible. I could imagine a modular OO approach, > with virtual methods where needed, with lack of performance being > compensated by progress in hardware. > > DoDi > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > Ros-dev@reactos.org > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev >
_______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
