4th scenario - App is actually "buggy" and doesnt check for any export.
We´re fucked up :P

On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Love Nystrom <love.nyst...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Correct me if I'm wrong (Alex?), but isn't the biggest difference
> between kernel 5.2 and 6.x that 6.x is *paging the kernel* ?
> (A huge design mistake if you ask me. One I bet will bite MS on the a**.
> If the kernel gets too fat it needs liposuction, not paging.)
>
> IMHO, adding new APIs, while keeping the (non-paging) kernel seems ideal.
>
> Best Regards
> // Neo
>
>
> On 2016-05-19 05.43, ros-dev-requ...@reactos.org wrote:
>
> Subject:
> Re: [ros-dev] Pale Moon drops ReactOS support
>
> From:
> Alex Ionescu <ion...@videotron.ca> <ion...@videotron.ca>
>
> Date:
> 2016-05-19 02.33
>
> To:
> ReactOS Development List <ros-dev@reactos.org> <ros-dev@reactos.org>
>
> I don't believe I said 'let's add random exports to our DLLs'. In
> fact, in your old thread, I was totally FOR your idea, I even wrote
> that the only sane way of doing it is with the app compat work.
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Timo Kreuzer <timo.kreu...@web.de> 
> <timo.kreu...@web.de> wrote:
>
> > We have been discussing this before and I wonder that Alex is not heavily> 
> > opposing the idea of randomly adding new exports to our user mode DLLs. It> 
> > is a well known fact that applications check for existance of exports to> 
> > decide how to behave, so ... not going to go over this again.>> To addess 
> > this issue I suggested to implement a compatibility layer. And> there was a 
> > detailed discussion about that on this mailing list.> 
> > https://www.reactos.org/pipermail/ros-dev/2015-March/017216.html>> Please 
> > take your time to read the whole thread again so we can avoid wasting> 
> > time, talking about the same things again.>> Timo
>
>
> --
> There is one thing stronger than all the armies in the world,
> and that's an idea whose time has come. [Victor Hugo]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev@reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

Reply via email to