I suck at writing documentation, but I'm always on IRC ready to help
anyone. ;P

On 9 September 2017 at 19:54, James Tabor <jimtabor.ros...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hope we will have a wiki page to help the Developers to switch over w/o
> any hassles.
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo <
> elh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> what about some "art" repo?
>>
>> It might have icons, wallpapers, some image and/or video galleries.....
>> (just like Demo images and videos at Windows folders....)
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Mark Jansen <mark.jan...@reactos.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> How about having a separate repository for wallpapers,
>>> and in 'master' or whatever only have the 'last release' wallpaper +
>>> one or 2 alternatives?
>>>
>>> The wallpaper repo can then have a structure where there is a folder
>>> per release,
>>> and an additional folder for potential candidates for next releases.
>>>
>>> On 8 September 2017 at 16:47, Colin Finck <co...@reactos.org> wrote:
>>> > Am 08.09.2017 um 14:34 schrieb Hermès BÉLUSCA-MAÏTO:> It seems that
>>> both
>>> > these links :
>>> > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3946538/git-clone-just-t
>>> he-files-please
>>> > , and
>>> > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1209999/using-git-to-get
>>> -just-the-latest-revision
>>> >>
>>> >> give a clue on how to just download the files without the history... >
>>> >
>>> >> [...]
>>> >>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> The builder(s) can have a "working" directory, in which they
>>> check-out
>>> >>> the
>>> >>> different "projects" they need for the build: reactos source can be
>>> DL'ed
>>> >>> into
>>> >>> "working/reactos.git" ; the wallpapers, rostests etc... can be DL'ed
>>> into
>>> >>> "working/rostests" and "working/wallpapers", then symlinks (OK on
>>> *nix &
>>> >>> windows) into the "working/reactos.git/modules" can be created that
>>> point
>>> >>> to "working/wallpapers" and "working/rostests" , and then we build as
>>> >>> usual
>>> >>> ?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Both of your ideas destroy the automatic relationship of a specific
>>> revision
>>> > of "reactos" with a specific revision of the modules.
>>> >
>>> > We don't want to start telling people to use that particular version of
>>> > "reactos" with that particular version of "rostests". It gets even
>>> worse if
>>> > you want to hack on both in a branch..
>>> > So matching versions must always stay together, and this is why I want
>>> to
>>> > keep them in a single repository, only enabled/disabled by a CMake
>>> variable.
>>> >
>>> > Of course, the logical next step would be overhauling our tree layout.
>>> > But first things first ;)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >>>> * I don't get the idea of that "rossubsys" directory created in
>>> 2014..
>>> >>>> These subsystems are all stubs, never built with modern ReactOS, and
>>> >>>> no work has happened since "reviving" them. I would just go and
>>> remove
>>> >>>> them again. You can always find them in our repository history.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>> As long as they can be found easily in the history, then ok.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > As with every Version Control System, the difficulty of finding deleted
>>> > files in history boils down to the creativity of your used GUI :)
>>> >
>>> > Shortcut for you to find related commits:
>>> >   git log --name-only | grep -C 5 rossubsys
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > I have updated my conversion scripts and rules at
>>> > https://github.com/ColinFinck/reactos-git-conversion-scripts to split
>>> off
>>> > "documentation" into its own repository.
>>> > Also they now perform the "reactos" directory reorganization and add
>>> the
>>> > "0.4.7-dev" tag for git describe.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Cheers,
>>> >
>>> > Colin
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Ros-dev mailing list
>>> > Ros-dev@reactos.org
>>> > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ros-dev mailing list
>>> Ros-dev@reactos.org
>>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ros-dev mailing list
>> Ros-dev@reactos.org
>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev@reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

Reply via email to