* Andrew Faulds <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi,

> ROS isn't suitable as a server OS, it lacks a healthy network stack, we
> aren't sure if VNC works and it definitely isn't suitable for this kind of
> usage. It's in *ALPHA* stage, is very buggy, incomplete, and *NOT
> SUITABLE*for this kind of mainstream usage.

My idea was to provide it as a little playgound (along with other
not-so-well-known OS'es, eg. Plan9), just to have some fun
(these installations will run charge-free on spare resources),
hoping that this gets a bit more audience and helping hands to ros.

Anyways, having lguest support, would be a good thing: ros could
reuse many resources of the host system (eg. networking, and a lot
of devices supported by linux). Maybe some day that could fill the
gap between native Windows and wine :)


cu
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/

 phone:  +49 36207 519931  email: [email protected]
 mobile: +49 151 27565287  icq:   210169427         skype: nekrad666
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme
----------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Ros-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-general

Reply via email to