On 9/26/05, John Siracusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Finally, I added (well, re-added, really) an optimization in load() that > requires subclasses to pass an alias to the actual invocant, rather than a > copy. The change is documented in the RDBO load() method docs. I don't > think it's too much to ask of subclasses, and it really does save a lot of > redundant work, especially when loading "with => ..." sub-objects. > Opinions? Without seeing an example of the the two different invocations, I can't comment. The CVS version is not on search.cpan.org yet (I guess). I found the file for the CVS version (http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/rose/rose/modules/Rose-DB-Object/lib/Rose/DB/Object.pm?rev=1.15&view=markup) but I don't have examples of current and previous usage, so I still can't compare. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
