On 10/6/05, John Siracusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/6/05, Uwe Voelker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Currently RDBO allows only one table/relation via require_objects. > > I don't recall why I had that constraint in there, but I'm pretty sure > there was a good reason. I'll look into it.
I removed the restriction and created a bunch of tests to make sure it actually works. As far as I can tell, it does. So the next version won't have that restriction. -John ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
