On 5/29/06, John Siracusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/29/06 9:21 PM, Cees Hek wrote:
> The fact that it dies with the word 'dubious' doesn't give me much to
> go on.
Next time try running it with "perl -I lib t/whatever.t" instead of using
the "prove" command. I didn't even see any "not ok" output, so I'm puzzled
too. The "dubious" thing is usually what's printed when it expected to run
N tests but actually ran less than N.
I downgraded DBD::Pg back to version 1.45 and ran the tests again, and
it looks like it is Segfaulting. So that would rule out Rose::DB::*.
My guess is that it was an incompatibility between DBI and DBD::Pg. I
am surprised that 'prove' hid the 'Segmentation fault' line, I'll have
to keep that in mind for the future (I was even redirecting stderr to
stdout, and still didn't see it).
I ran an strace on the segfault, but it didn't point to anything
obvious, and since an upgrade of DBD::Pg fixes things, I am happy to
leave it at that.
Cheers,
Cees
-------------------------------------------------------
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
