On 6/1/06, Jonathan Vanasco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jun 1, 2006, at 1:11 PM, John Siracusa wrote: >> That's bad code because it assumes that the column accessor name is >> the same as the column name, which is not always the case. > > in my code it is... i enforce that for simplicity, and then have '_' > prepended accessor names for non-column name accessors
Okay, but at least comment the code: # This assumes that column names match method names so your future-self will be reminded of this constraint :) > i want to clone the data/row representation of the db for user and > serialization by non-rosedb code -- the clone methods look like they > will include the object class, meta data, and rosedb associated > items. i really just need a 'dict' / hash of the column_name/ > column_value pairs. Ah, gotcha. -John _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object