Hi. Has anybody out there ever tried passing Rose::DB::Object subclass instances into a Safe compartment? This is almost certainly an issue specific to Safe and not specific to the Rose:: family in general, though I think the Rose::DB::Object internals are "late-binding" with sufficient frequency to make them especially likely to break within a Safe compartment. For instance, I can pass an instance of a Rose::DB::Object subclass into a Safe compartment. The column accessor methods will work within the compartment. But accessing "child" objects through the appropriate method breaks, because the object instance apparently needs to instantiate the child objects (this happens whether the data for "child objects" was retrieved in a manager query or not; seems that the fetched data isn't wrapped as an object until it's actually needed -- this isn't based on any exhaustive research on my part and may be an incorrect observation).
If anyone has any experience with this or suggestions to get it working (beyond "don't use Safe" :) I'd love to hear them. Thanks. - Ethan -- Ethan Rowe End Point Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
