On Jul 10, 2006, at 2:20 PM, Clayton Scott wrote:
> meta :
> class : My::Object
> columns :
> a: 1
> b : 2
> c : 3
personally, id rather see this:
meta_rosedb:
class : My::Object
api: 0.73
columns:
a: 1
b: 2
c: 3
just because, if this is going into yaml/json/xml, there's a chance
that its going to be accessed/used with other frameworks - so it
would be nice to see everything in a rosedb space
also, since some rose stuff changes from time to time ( backwards
compatible , but new features are added ), it would be nice if there
were an api item for rose in there. this way we don't: store object
@11:00, upgrade @11:01, retrieve @11:02
its an edge case, but i fear stuff like that
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
