On Sep 20, 2006, at 7:21 PM, John Siracusa wrote:
> 1. Override load() in your common base class and check is_deleted()
> before
> 2. Override get_objects() in a custom Manager subclass and then
> base all
good ideas. I'll give that a shot
> straightforward and predictable. (What if I *want* to load "deleted"
> records?) The subclassing method is explicit; all's fair in your own
i was thinking that you'd have a different relationship defined. but
i can see how that would cause issues with things that are defined
not in relationships, but in class overrides.
Here's my last idea for object classes....
I've been doing a lot of object loading, and every now and then i
need to get at the raw sql, which can be confusing as right now ,
with_objects/require_objects works as such:
require_objects => [ 'a' , 'b' , 'c' ]
with_objects => [ 'd' , 'e' , 'f' ]
and things number from t[1] ( $class ) , require_objects, with_objects
so i was fooling around the other night, and I think i can trivially
patch querybuilder to do this:
table_alias=> 'user',
requre_objects=> [
'a'=> 'A1',
'b'=> 'B1',
'c'=> 'C1',
],
or even
with_objects => [
'd',
[ 'e'=> 'E1' ],
'f',
]
which would allow for custom mapping of table aliases
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
