On 10/12/06 2:55 PM, Uwe Voelker wrote:
> column_map expects the real column name and does not accept an aliased
> name. Is there a way to work with my aliases in relationship definition?
> Or should I stick with column names?

Stick with column names.  Relationships describe a link between tables
through one or more column pairs, so it's only natural that they use column
names.  Column aliases are sometimes necessary due to Perl method name
conflicts, but no such conflicts exist in a relationship definition.

-John



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object

Reply via email to