On 10/23/06 11:51 PM, Jonathan wrote: > a) I wanted to make sure that not_found did what i thought it did > ( according to source , it seems to ) > b) i have it doing that already. it's just weird having a double > negative... it seems odd that found isn't in there already
The success case is clear: you get a true return value back from load(). When there's a failure, depending on your error mode, you may need a way to distinguish between a failure due to some unforeseen problem (network error, database error, etc.) and an "expected" failure because a row simply isn't in the database. That's why there's not_found(), but no found(). -John ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
