Peter Leonard wrote:
> I understand the complexity involved, and what we're looking for is the 
> quick storage & retrieval of the underlying data

It sounds like you want to cache the data.  Did you consider expanding 
Rose::DB::Object::Cached to use your data storage of choice instead of 
memory?

- Perrin

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object

Reply via email to