Peter Leonard wrote: > I understand the complexity involved, and what we're looking for is the > quick storage & retrieval of the underlying data
It sounds like you want to cache the data. Did you consider expanding Rose::DB::Object::Cached to use your data storage of choice instead of memory? - Perrin ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object