On 12/5/06 11:34 PM, Kevin McGrath wrote: > It looks like you have to have uniquely named column names: > http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/ask/f?p=4950:8:::::F4950_P8_DISPLAYID:768123480 > 57 (search for 918 on the page and you'll get to the right spot)
So the "work-around" is actually the solution, I guess. Blah. Seriously, why can't Oracle support a sane limit/offset syntax and then translate it into its own crazy form internally? Well, at least my unique column aliasing feature is finally coming in handy... -John ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
