On 12/15/06, Jonathan Vanasco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > maybe in a perfect world, there could be a rose object that did this: > > a- was aware if it were in a transaction > b- could have class metadata that notes if a column value is a > server side function > c- could realize that an operation would cause a new server-side > result (ie: a timestamp operation or multi-column explicit function > ( cola = cola+colb ) ) > d- would reload if the above conditions were met > > its not a simple solution. i wouldn't expect rose to be able to > even handle anything like this for years - if ever.
Why is being "in a transaction" relevant? Unless the specific isolation level is known, I don't think it tells us anything. -John ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object