On 12/15/06, Jonathan Vanasco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> maybe in a perfect world, there could be a rose object that did this:
>
> a- was aware if  it were in a transaction
> b- could have class metadata that  notes if a column value is a
>    server side function
> c- could realize that an operation would cause a new server-side
>    result (ie: a timestamp operation or multi-column explicit function
>    ( cola = cola+colb ) )
> d- would reload if the above conditions were met
>
> its not a  simple solution.  i wouldn't expect rose to be able to
> even handle anything like this for years  -  if  ever.

Why is being "in a transaction" relevant?  Unless the specific
isolation level is known, I don't think it tells us anything.

-John

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object

Reply via email to