On 1/19/07, David Naughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 10:23:45AM -0500, John Siracusa wrote:
>> On 1/18/07, David Naughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I'd rather contribute a patch that does this properly, but I'm not sure I
>>> understand all the ways that RDBO uses schemata, or all the ways that the
>>> Oracle and Pg concepts of schemata differ from the MySQL concept
of multiple
>>> databases. Thoughts? Any advice would be much appreciated.
>>>
>> I think simply making Rose::DB::MySQL say that it supports_schema() will
>> work, since DBD::mysql seems to accept mysql "database" names in
the "schema"
>> slot on most calls.
>
> That's great if it's that easy. Are you saying that the next release of
> Rose::DB::MySQL will "say that it supports_schema()"?

Yeah, assuming it really is that easy and all the tests pass :)

-John

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object

Reply via email to