There was a conversation back in September about left outer joins with
additional where criteria:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=34475671
I was wondering if any progress had been made on the issue since then, or
whether there are any new features we could use for dealing with this case.
Also, I wanted to say I (partially) disagree with, or don't understand, the
part that "it's okay to have a variety of conditions, but they each require
a new named relationship". In a strict relational model, yeah, you're
right. But left outers, even NULLs, have always been in the gray
never-never land between pure relational algebra and hacked-up real-world
database software.
I tend not to think about the additional clauses in the left outers as a new
named relationship. They're more a kind of data-driven relationship.
Admitted, I know jack about your architecture, but maybe a generics/template
model will satisfy the design?
Schnitz
BTW - John, I love reading your stuff on ArsTechnica. I read it word for
word. All 21 pages. :)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier.
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Rose-db-object mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
