On 2/8/07, Jonathan Vanasco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Today I think I realized a functionality that might make sense -- if > the results returned by a manager call weren't simply an array, but a > class object. > > It would behave just as an array - there would be no real difference > in current functionality. perhaps a tied array or blessed reference.
This is a fine idea, but I think the correct approach is to make a new Manager class that uses the existing Manager class internally. That's a lot cleaner than trying to further augment the existing Manager. RDBO was always designed to have more than one Manager-type class. I just only wrote the one :) Making a "sort of" new Manager by wrapping the existing Manager is fine too. If you come up with something suitably generic and useful to others, we can hash it out on the list and then either fold it into RDBO or put it up on CPAN as a separate module. -John ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
