On 2/17/07 10:22 AM, Graham Barr wrote: > On Feb 16, 2007, at 7:26 PM, Jonathan Vanasco wrote: >> On Feb 16, 2007, at 1:11 PM, John Siracusa wrote: >>> Con: small additional overhead to check and coerce the args >> >> wouldn't that require all of these get_objects parameters to now >> become reserved words, unusable as column names ? ( which would have >> been safe if they were in a query clause ) > > No. Normally get_object takes a list of args. In the cases John wrote > there would only be one argument which would be a HASH or ARRAY > reference
Right, there's no ambiguity because a hashref or arrayref has never been a valid top-level arg before. -John ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
