On 1 Mar 2007, at 13:44, John Siracusa wrote: > On 3/1/07 7:03 AM, Adrian Howard wrote: >> I've got some SET columns which RDBO seems to be parsing fine, since >> the column() values() are set okay, but it accepts things that aren't >> in values(). Bug? Expected behaviour? > > Bug, now fixed in SVN. Thanks for the report.
Thank you for the fix :-) Adrian ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
