> On 3/8/07 7:33 PM, Michael Reece wrote:
>> here's what i came up with:
>>
>> in package My::RDBO::_base,
>>
>> sub meta_class { 'My::RDBO::_meta' }
>>
>> and then,
>>
>> package My::RDBO::_meta;
>> use base 'Rose::DB::Object::Metadata';
>>
>> sub auto_prime_caches { 0 }
>>
>> is this the expected way to do this sort of thing?
>
> Yes, only perhaps with a less creepy metadata class name :) Making a
> custom
> metadata subclass is a common way to change default behavior. It needn't
> be
> a "hidden" class with a name like "_meta". Just call it
> My::RDBO::Metadata.
>
> -John
that's all fine and good until i create a table called 'metadata'. :)
unlikely, perhaps, but not as unlikely as creating one called '_meta'.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
