On Apr 6, 2007, at 10:01 AM, John Siracusa wrote:
> On 4/5/07, Jonathan Vanasco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Any chance of these features being pushed back into rose?
>
> The first thing you're likely to see is support for triggers on save,
> insert, update, and delete because overriding some of those
> "correctly" (handling transactions and so on) takes some thought and
> is easy to get wrong.
>
> After that, it should be easier to add the simple "die on
> insert/update/delete" behavior. If someone wants to make
> Rose::DB::Object::ReadOnly right now with the existing mechanisms,
> like I said earlier, go for it and post what you produce (with tests
> and docs if you want it to have a chance of being rolled into RDBO
> proper :)
Sorry, Let me clarify:
Ovid - you have the seed of this readonly class... john mentioned
what needs to happen for it to get rolled into rose. any chance
that might happen?
// Jonathan Vanasco
| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
| FindMeOn.com - The cure for Multiple Web Personality Disorder
| Web Identity Management and 3D Social Networking
| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
| RoadSound.com - Tools For Bands, Stuff For Fans
| Collaborative Online Management And Syndication Tools
| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Rose-db-object mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
