Ok, I just have to ask. What are people doing for dbh caching?
I know this comes up often:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.perl.modules.dbi.rose-db-object/1138/focus=1140
Apache::DBI is mentioned, but, unless I'm mistaken, is limited to
mod_perl environments. Can just save $DBH locally on connect, but
it's nice to have the pings done automatically.
What about using Ima::DBI? Would that stomp on RDB?
I'm also still trying to understand the point of a new dbh for each
object (from the same table). I see how that can be worked around
from that message above, but I'm wondering if there's a specific
reason or if that's just a by-product of using RDB.
Humbly yours,
--
Bill Moseley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Rose-db-object mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
