On 4/23/07, Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://tinyurl.com/26hpwz
What's wrong with implementing the scenario described at that URL
exactly as it's explained, by using multi-column foreign keys and a
check constraint on the subtype table(s)?
> A simple syntax could be:
>
> distributed_keys => [
> server => {
> dedicated => {
> class => 'My::Server::Dedicated',
> key_columns => { id => 'server_id' },
> },
> shared => {
> class => 'My::Server::Dedicated',
> key_columns => { id => 'server_id' },
> },
> }
> ],
Is that syntactic sugar for the multi-column fk scenario described
earlier, or is it something else?
-John
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Rose-db-object mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
