John Siracusa wrote: > Does anyone have any good ideas for a namespace for module that augment or > extend RDBO, but that are not part of the "official" RDBO distribution? The > first thing that springs to my mind is: > > Rose::DBx::* > > That'd be for both modules that are related to Rose::DB and modules that are > related to Rose::DB::Object. > > For example, Mike Schilli has a module that splits a single big Manager call > into a series of smaller ones internally (in order to get around some memory > issues in some DBD::* modules). I'd call that one: > > Rose::DBx::Object::InternalPager > > The ::Object part is there to indicate that it's an extension of > Rose::DB::Object, not Rose::DB. > > Anyone have any better ideas?
I like DBx and xDB. Where would an extension of Rose::Object go? I wouldn't expect it under Rose::DBx, right? I'd expect something like Rose::ObjectX in that case (following the DBx convention), no? Maurice ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
