I have three classes. User, Group, and GroupMembership. GM is a mapping class
between User and Group. (I will have additional data on it in the future.)
I do this:
my $user = User->new( ... )->create;
my $group = Group->new( ... )->create;
@g = $user->groups;
is(@g, 0); # passes
$user->add_groups({ ... });
So now I should have that user in that group...
@g = $user->groups;
is(@g, 1); # passes
@u = $group->users;
is(@u, 1); # fails, but that seems reasonable
$group->load;
@u = $group->users;
is(@u, 0); # fails, which is a little less reasonable
Okay, at this point I looked at the docs and decided to try using "with"
$group->load(with => 'groups');
@u = $group->users;
is(@u, 1); # hooray!
...except when I was about to cheer about this on IRC, I noticed that I'd said
"with => 'groups'" and there *is* no "groups" relationship. I had meant to
write "with => 'users'" but flubbed. It seems like even this works:
$group->load(with => 1);
Huh!
(I later realized that I wanted [ 'users' ] anyway, but... well, this was just
weird.)
--
rjbs
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Rose-db-object mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
