On Sep 7, 2007, at 5:23, John Siracusa wrote: > But what about all the existing code that expects undef to trigger > the use > of the default value?
They should set the "CRAZY_DEPRECATED_BACKWARDS_COMPATIBLE_MODE_ENABLED" variable. ;-) Whatever the fix, I agree with Graham that it should be phrased in terms of "defaults are only used when inserting new objects" rather than "undef sets null". I liked your idea of having an explicit way to say "set the default value", although I don't have a use case for it on hand. - ask -- http://develooper.com/ - http://askask.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
