John Siracusa wrote on 11/8/07 10:05 AM: > I've checked in a preliminary implementation of the proposed > new_or_cached() Rose::DB class method. No docs or tests yet, and > debugging is enabled by default. Please give it a spin and tell me if > it's useful.
fwiw, it passes the simple test case I had attached earlier. As I read this implementation, it will DWIM when using Apache::DBI and otherwise act like the simpler patch I sent, with the advantage of an override-able Cache class. Is that a fair summary? Nice work, John. -- Peter Karman . http://peknet.com/ . [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
