John Siracusa wrote on 11/8/07 10:05 AM:
> I've checked in a preliminary implementation of the proposed
> new_or_cached() Rose::DB class method.  No docs or tests yet, and
> debugging is enabled by default.  Please give it a spin and tell me if
> it's useful.

fwiw, it passes the simple test case I had attached earlier.

As I read this implementation, it will DWIM when using Apache::DBI and otherwise
act like the simpler patch I sent, with the advantage of an override-able Cache
class. Is that a fair summary?

Nice work, John.

-- 
Peter Karman  .  http://peknet.com/  .  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object

Reply via email to