On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:14:27 -0500 "John Siracusa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
JS> The basic idea (safe repeated auto-generation with all JS> customizations stored elsewhere) has been done several different JS> ways in RDBO by others, and I've been meaning to formalize at least JS> one way to do it. But I don't think I'd choose the "extra level of JS> inheritance" technique. I'm OK with any technique, as long as it regenerates classes safely when the schema changes. The extra inheritance is, now that I think about it, only tangential to what I really liked: the safe regeneration. FWIW I'd use POD markup to separate custom code from auto-generated code. It's safe, has markup properties, and can contain a comment about its purpose. Ted ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
