On Jan 29, 2008 10:06 PM, John Siracusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> The "db" atribute of an RDBO-derived object "isa" Rose::DB, but each
> Rose::DB-derived object "has a" DBI $dbh.  IOW, plain old DBI database
> handles are used via delegation in RDBO.  There's no subclassing of
> DBI classes at all.

Good to hear.  Do you happen to know if RDBO will tolerate a
DBIx::ContextualFetch based DBI handle?

but keep in mind the new new_or_cached() Rose::DB method that makes a
> lot of the caching discussion in some older threads less relevant
> these days.
> http://search.cpan.org/dist/Rose-DB/lib/Rose/DB.pm#new_or_cached

Yes, I found that one - seems very useful.  Maybe something to add to the

Thanks for the help!

This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
Rose-db-object mailing list

Reply via email to