++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Please read the disclaimer at the bottom of this e-mail.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Hi Anthony,
Yes the reverse engineering process had errors but to my knowledge these
were
solved. The C++ Analyser was used.
I still have the problem that classes are missing from the reverse
engineered model.
Do you have any specific examples of what kind of errors/warnings can be
ignored ?
More on this if I find any specific errors relating to the missing classes.
Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: Kesterton, Anthony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2000 10:48 AM
To: Liz Dally; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: (ROSE) C ++ Reverse Engineering missing classes
Hi Liz
> I am currently trying to reverse engineer from C++ source files.
>
> After completing this it seems that some classes are missing from the
> generated model
> even though header files existed for them.
>
> Has anyone else experienced this problem or knows why this occurs ??
Did the reverse-engineering process have any errors reported?
If you are using the C++ analyser to do this - then there are many
warnings/errors you can ignore if they don't relate to the classes in
question - but you may have picked up an error that is relevant.
If you are using the VC++ integration in Rose, then again, it should pick up
all your classes.
Which integration are you using?
regards
anthony
************************************************************************
* Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
* For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
*
* Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Archive of messages:
http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl
* Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
*
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subject:<BLANK>
* Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
*
*************************************************************************
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email is intended for the named recipient(s) only. Its contents
are confidential and may only be retained by the named recipient(s)
and may only be copied or disclosed with the consent of The London
Clearing House (LCH). If you are not an intended recipient please
delete this e-mail and notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The contents of this email are subject to contract in all cases,
and LCH makes no contractual commitment save where confirmed by hard
copy. LCH accepts no liability, including liability for negligence,
in respect of any statement in this email.
The London Clearing House Limited, Registered Office: Aldgate House,
33 Aldgate High Street, London EC3N 1EA. Recognised as a Clearing
House under the Financial Services Act 1986. Reg in England No.25932
Telephone: 020 7426 7000 Internet: http://www.lch.co.uk
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
************************************************************************
* Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
* For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
*
* Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Archive of messages:
http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl
* Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
*
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subject:<BLANK>
* Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
*
*************************************************************************
