I have a question which relates to representation of a Singleton class in
UML.
When a singleton class REed into Rose, it shows up with a unidirectional
reflexive association. Rose does this because it finds a STATIC object of
this class as a member varaible. To my way of thinking (correct me if I am
wrong), reflexive association for a class means that TWO objects of this
class are rquired to communicate. But for a singleton class ONE and ONLY
ONE object can exist.
Is this a correct representation of a singleton class? Any comments or
thoughts are appreciated.
Manoj Chopra
************************************************************************
* Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
* For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
*
* Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Archive of messages:
http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl
* Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
*
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subject:<BLANK>
* Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
*
*************************************************************************
