Hello, everyone. I have three questions in making sequence diagram. 1. Representaion of LOOP Someone said that '*' is UML notation for LOOP. But as you know Rose doesn't support this. And another said that he used notes. I also use notes. But it looks not preety good. Too many notes, and not showing good. 2. Representaion of Branch It's deficut to describe branch in sequence diagram. I also use note, and as I mentioned above, diagram is not good to show. Someone says that if you need Branch(or alternative case), it is another scenario, so, there need another sequence diagram. But as you know, there are many duplicated parts, and in case of change, it's not good 3. Representation of Return. As you know, when describing return value of message, the check of method is disappeeared. In other words, message is just text, and not related with method. Someone says that when drawing sequence diagram, don't denote return vlaue. But in that case, it is difficult to understand flow. After making sequence diagram, it is difficult to understand details. It looks like flow of rough public methods. So, if someone implement sequence diagram that is not made by themselves, it is difficult to implement, because describing details in sequence diagram is very difficut. How can I refine sequence diagram. ************************************************************************ * Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions. * For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support * * Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Archive of messages: http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl * Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To unsubscribe from the list, please send email * * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Subject:<BLANK> * Body: unsubscribe rose_forum * *************************************************************************
