Hi UML Modelers, I'm having difficulty with the Instantiates relation in Rose Modeler 2000 and 2001. In particular, I cannot reproduce explicit parameter binding as illustrated in figure 13-34 in the UML Reference Manual (Tre Amigos, Addison-Wesley, 1999) using either of the Rational products mentioned above. The short of it is that I cannot get Rose to label the instantiates relation with a <<bind>>(parameter-list) string as the examples in the UML RM depict. I can and have gone into the specification-->detail window of the instantiated class and entered my parameters in the "Actual Arguments:" list. But that doesn't change the model visually. Another question I have has to do with the fact that the Rose doesn't replace the formal parameters in operation signatures with the actual parameters in those signatures in the instantiated class. Why is this? Are we supposed to add all those operations and attributes with the actual parameter types into the Instantiated class manually? That seems lame to me. I must be missing something here that makes this a necessary evil. Anyone know why? Please share with me your experiences with Rose and Parameterized and Instantiated classes and how you tackled this situation in your models. Thanks a bunch for you thoughts, Cheers, -Scott ************************************************************************ * Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions. * For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support * * Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Archive of messages: http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl * Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To unsubscribe from the list, please send email * * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Subject:<BLANK> * Body: unsubscribe rose_forum * *************************************************************************
