We are reverse-engineering for our existing code. Is the following properly supported by Rose (we have 2001 for NT): -we want to turn off the unique ID generation, so our code doesn't get cluttered with these (we know how to turn this off, this isn't the question) -we want to move the reverse-engineered classes out of the "generic" package created by rev. eng and move them into a properly named packages in our model structure -we subsequently want to update the reverse-eng'd model as code changes are made to the code. (eg. perhaps as part of our nightly build, or once a week, we'd update our model with the code changes). The key question here is: Will Rose properly be able to associate the previously rev. eng'd classes with the live code, even if the unique id's are not embedded in our code. Thanks, Joe ************************************************************************ * Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions. * For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support * * Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Archive of messages: http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl * Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To unsubscribe from the list, please send email * * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Subject:<BLANK> * Body: unsubscribe rose_forum * *************************************************************************
