Dear members,
Now I am trying to migrate some C++ classes to ANSI C++ classes. Even the ANSI C++
offers a good
solution for the rounding trip I see the following drawbacks:
1. A component has to be defined for every class.
2. Some setting have to be done from the file, for example to set a method as virtual
or constant, etc.
3. When you delete an attribute the get and set are not deleted, automatically.
4. I don't see the way to configure the class diagram to don't see obvious
information, such as:
get and set of the attributes, default constructors, etc. The design if for showing
relevant information
of the class!!!. If the default behavior show all this information then you will get a
design with a lot of irrelevant
information. (it will be not readable!)
5. The namespace declaration is missing.
Please can some one tell me how could be fixed some of the problems I have mentioned,
Thanks in advance,
David
************************************************************************
* Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
* For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
*
* Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Archive of messages:
http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl
* Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
*
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subject:<BLANK>
* Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
*
*************************************************************************
