We are currently using Rational Rose 2000e. We have to transform our object model
into a logical data model using the Rose data modeler add-in. The model has an
abstract class with 2 �private� attributes � OID and lastUpdateTs (friendship required
feature unspecified) . It is the intent of the object modelers to have these 2
attributes flow down to all the derived classes and then on to the logical data model.
My areas of concern:
1. Is is correct to model these attributes as private rather than protected or public
in an abstract or base class?
2. Even when I tweak the class and make the attributes �protected� with friendship
required or even �public� these are not carried over to the data model when I try to
transform the object to data model transformation
Any input would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Abby Thakur
__________________________________________________________________
Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Webmail account today at
http://webmail.netscape.com/
************************************************************************
* Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
* For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
*
* Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Archive of messages:
http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl
* Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
*
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subject:<BLANK>
* Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
*
*************************************************************************
