I created a subclass for an abstract class in Rose. This would automatically add all the superclass operations to the subclass specification. When I go and specify the semantics for a particular method in the subclass, this gets copied to the superclass method (that is not good as it disallows override). This happens vice versa too. When I change the semantics for a operation on the superclass it will automatically change it in the subclass too. So, basically either way I am not able to achieve overriding a particular method in the superclass. Should I turn some flag on for being able to do this or is this a bug in Rose2000?? ************************************************************************ * Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions. * For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support * * Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Archive of messages: http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl * Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To unsubscribe from the list, please send email * * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Subject:<BLANK> * Body: unsubscribe rose_forum * *************************************************************************
