No there is not.
What is a "abstract use case"?
I know what an abstract class is.
Eric Aker
-----Original Message-----
From: Williamson, Rusty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 10:14 AM
To: 'Rose Forum'
Subject: (ROSE) UML question number one
Hello,
Does anyone know if there is any kind of requirement that use cases in
extent and include relationships must always be abstract use cases?
Thanks!
Rusty
---------------------------------------------------------------
Rusty Williamson
Sr. Systems Architect
Corporate Office
GERS, Inc.
10431 Wateridge Circle * San Diego, CA 92121
(800) 854-2263 * CA (858) 457-3888
FAX (858) 484-9237 * Desk (858) 484-9237
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Web http://www.gers.com
"e-Business Solutions for the Consumer-Driven World"
************************************************************************
* Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
* For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
*
* Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Archive of messages:
http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl
* Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
*
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subject:<BLANK>
* Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
*
*************************************************************************
************************************************************************
* Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
* For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
*
* Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Archive of messages:
http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl
* Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
*
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subject:<BLANK>
* Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
*
*************************************************************************
