NO, NO!
The access violations are not showing that you are missing dependency. They
show that your system was architected and that someone has violated the
architectural decisions made the architect. You need to move the classes
or change the relationships in the system.
Eric
-----Original Message-----
From: Smoly Walter MET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 9:05 AM
To: Rose Forum (E-Mail)
Subject: (ROSE) Access Violations
Hi,
is there a way to automatically create dependencies for all those access
violations, which are detected by the report.
Kind regards
Walter
************************************************************************
* Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
* For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
*
* Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Archive of messages:
http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl
* Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
*
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subject:<BLANK>
* Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
*
*************************************************************************
************************************************************************
* Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
* For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
*
* Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Archive of messages:
http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl
* Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
*
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subject:<BLANK>
* Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
*
*************************************************************************
