I have a conundrum. I need to attach shared <<modules>> classes to components of a subsystem that reside in an enterprise model. Rose keeps the generation information for a component in the cat file of the source .cat file where the class resides rather than in the components .cat file I don't want the Enterprise model dirtied with the subsystem implementations. Am I thinking about this wrong or is Rose just storing the information at the wrong end of the association and what options do I have for implementing a solution. At this point I'm feeling that I am stuck with documenting the discrepancy and moving on, but I feel dirty? Robert Fontaine [EMAIL PROTECTED] ************************************************************************ * Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions. * For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support * * Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Archive of messages: http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl * Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To unsubscribe from the list, please send email * * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Subject:<BLANK> * Body: unsubscribe rose_forum * *************************************************************************
